In the Supreme Court of the United States, State of Maryland, petitioner, v. Alonzo J. King, Jr. respondent : on writ of certiorari to the Maryland Court of Appeals : brief of the National Governors Association, the National Conference of State Legislatures, the Council of State Governments, the National Association of Counties, the International City/County Management Association, the United States Conference of Mayors, the International Municipal Lawyers Association, and the National Sheriffs' Association as amici curiae in support of petitioner / Lisa E. Soronen [and 5 others].
2013
INTERNET
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Details
E-resource Policy
Linked Resources
Author
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, State of Maryland, petitioner, v. Alonzo J. King, Jr. respondent : on writ of certiorari to the Maryland Court of Appeals : brief of the National Governors Association, the National Conference of State Legislatures, the Council of State Governments, the National Association of Counties, the International City/County Management Association, the United States Conference of Mayors, the International Municipal Lawyers Association, and the National Sheriffs' Association as amici curiae in support of petitioner / Lisa E. Soronen [and 5 others].
Published
Washington, D. C. : Wilson-Epes Printing Co., Inc., [2013?]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2014]
Call Number
INTERNET
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: State of Maryland, petitioner, v. Alonzo J. King, Jr., respondent; on writ of certiorari to the Maryland Court of Appeals; brief of the National Governors Association
Description
1 online resource (xi, 24 pages).
System Control No.
(NjRocCCS)ccn00449811
Summary
The issue presented is whether the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari to determine whether a state law (here, Maryland's) authorizing the collection of DNA samples from those arrested for (and not necessarily charged with or convicted of) for certain offenses ("DNA arrest laws" or "DNA collection laws") violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches. Among the issues raised are privacy concerns and the likely disproportionate effect of the practice on minorities.
Note
"No. 12-207."
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities": pages iii-xi.
Digital File Characteristics
text file
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed June 24, 2014.
Record Appears in
Added Author