Common interests in international litigation : a case study on natural resource exploitation disputes / Claire Buggenhoudt.
2017
KZ6250 .B84 2017 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Common interests in international litigation : a case study on natural resource exploitation disputes / Claire Buggenhoudt.
Published
Cambridge : Intersentia, [2017]
Call Number
KZ6250 .B84 2017
ISBN
1780684460
9781780684468
9781780684468
Description
xx, 201 pages ; 25 cm.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)967760850
Summary
"How are common interests protected in international dispute settlement? What is the role of different courts and tribunals? Is the case law on common interests consistent? Do we need more consistency for a better protection of common interests? Common Interests in International Litigation provides answers to questions that arise in international litigation as a result of an increasing recognition of common interests in this field and an ever-expanding network of specialised judicial bodies."--Back cover.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 185-197) and index.
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
v
Table of Cases
xi
List of Abbreviations
xix
ch. 1
Introduction and Research Design
1
1.1.
Background
2
1.1.1.
History and Nature of International Law
2
1.1.2.
Emergence of the Common Interest in International Law
4
1.1.2.1.
Peace and Security
6
1.1.2.2.
Environmental Concerns
7
1.1.2.3.
Areas beyond National Territorial Jurisdiction
8
1.1.2.4.
Protection of Human Rights
9
1.1.3.
Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies
10
1.1.4.
Common Interest in International Litigation
14
1.2.
Definitions, Methodology and Structure
16
1.2.1.
Definitions
17
1.2.1.1.
Public and Common Interests
17
1.2.1.2.
International Litigation
20
1.2.1.3.
Natural Resource Exploitation
25
1.2.2.
Methodology
27
1.2.3.
Structure
29
ch. 2
Procedural Considerations and Common Interests
31
2.1.
Introduction
31
2.2.
Jurisdiction
32
2.2.1.
International Court of Justice
33
2.2.2.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
37
2.2.3.
Summary: Jurisdiction and Common Interest
39
2.3.
Standing
39
2.3.1.
International Court of Justice
40
2.3.2.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
42
2.3.3.
WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
43
2.3.4.
Regional Human Rights Mechanisms
45
2.3.4.1.
European Court of Human Rights
45
2.3.4.2.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
46
2.3.4.3.
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
47
2.3.5.
Summary: Standing and Common Interest
47
2.4.
Evidence
48
2.4.1.
International Court of Justice
49
2.4.2.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
50
2.4.3.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
53
2.4.4.
WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
53
2.4.5.
Regional Human Rights Mechanisms
55
2.4.5.1.
European Court of Human Rights
55
2.4.5.2.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
56
2.4.5.3.
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
58
2.4.6.
Summary: Evidence and Common Interest
58
2.5.
Third Party Interventions
59
2.5.1.
International Court of Justice
59
2.5.2.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
61
2.5.3.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
63
2.5.4.
WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
67
2.5.5.
Regional Human Rights Mechanisms
69
2.5.5.1.
European Court of Human Rights
69
2.5.5.2.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
69
2.5.5.3.
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
71
2.5.6.
Summary: Third Party Interventions and Common Interest
71
2.6.
Provisional Measures
71
2.6.1.
International Court of Justice
72
2.6.2.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
73
2.6.3.
Summary: Provisional Measures and Common Interest
79
ch. 3
Substantive Considerations and Common Interests
81
3.1.
Introduction
81
3.2.
Public Interest Exceptions
82
3.2.1.
International Court of Justice
82
3.2.1.1.
Emergency Clauses
82
3.2.2.
WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
85
3.2.2.1.
Like Products in the NT Provisions
85
3.2.2.2.
General Exceptions Clause
89
3.2.2.3.
Health Concerns and SPS Agreement
97
3.2.2.4.
PPMs and TBT Agreement
99
3.2.3.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
102
3.2.3.1.
Like Circumstances in the NT and MFN Provisions
102
3.2.3.2.
Regulatory Takings
105
3.2.3.3.
FET and Proportionality
110
3.2.3.4.
Non-Precluded Measures
114
3.2.4.
Regional Human Rights Mechanisms
117
3.2.4.1.
European Court of Human Rights
117
3.2.4.2.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
126
3.2.4.3.
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
128
3.2.5.
Summary: Public Interest Exceptions
130
3.3.
Common Interest Norms
131
3.3.1.
International Court of Justice
131
3.3.1.1.
Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes Norms
131
3.3.1.2.
Environmental Protection
132
3.3.2.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
137
3.3.3.
Regional Human Rights Mechanisms
140
3.3.3.1.
European Court of Human Rights
140
3.3.3.2.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
142
3.3.3.3.
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
144
3.3.4.
Summary: Common Interest Norms
146
ch. 4
Common Approach to Common Interests
149
4.1.
Reasons for (In)Consistency in International Litigation on Common Interests
149
4.1.1.
Introduction
149
4.1.2.
Reasons for (In)Consistency
150
4.1.2.1.
Factors that Affect the Consistency of International Litigation in General
152
4.1.2.2.
Factors that Are Specifically Relevant for Common Interest Litigation
159
4.2.
Promoting Respect for Common Interests in International Litigation
166
4.2.1.
Coordination Techniques
167
4.2.1.1.
Vertical Coordination: Hierarchy
167
4.2.1.2.
Horizontal Coordination: Procedural and Private International Law Rules
168
4.2.1.3.
Coordination through Judicial Dialogue
169
4.2.1.4.
Harmonious Interpretation
169
4.2.1.5.
Systemic Interpretation
170
4.2.1.6.
Interim Conclusion: Coordination to Protect Common Interests
171
4.2.2.
Common Decision-Making Method
172
4.2.2.1.
Compromise of Interests
172
4.2.2.2.
Balancing
173
4.2.2.3.
Balancing and the Margin of Deference
174
4.2.2.4.
Interim Solution: Common Decision-Making Method to Protect Common Interests
176
4.2.3.
Pluralistic Approach
176
4.3.
Conclusion
179
ch. 5
General Conclusion
181
Bibliography
185
Index
199