Forms liberate : reclaiming the jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller / Kristen Rundle.
2012
K235 .R86 2012 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Forms liberate : reclaiming the jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller / Kristen Rundle.
Published
Oxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart, [2012]
Copyright
©2012
Call Number
K235 .R86 2012
ISBN
9781849461047 (hbk.)
184946104X (hbk.)
184946104X (hbk.)
Description
xi, 209 pages ; 24 cm
System Control No.
(OCoLC)794576961
Note
Includes index.
Record Appears in
Portion of Title
Reclaiming the jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller
Added Author
Table of Contents
1.
Reclaiming Fuller
1
I.
Form and Agency
8
II.
What is Being `Reclaimed'?
11
III.
About the Book: Method, Material and Structure
17
IV.
Outline of the Chapters
20
2.
Before the Debate
25
I.
The Early Fuller: Positivism and Natural Law at Mid-century
28
II.
Eunomics: A `Science or Theory of Good Order and Workable Social Arrangements'
32
A.
Eunomics `Writ Large'
37
B.
Eunomics `Writ Small': The Models
39
III.
Navigating the Labels
45
IV.
Conclusion
48
3.
The 1958 Debate
51
I.
Mapping the Debate
54
A.
Setting the Agenda: Hart's Claims
54
B.
Reorienting the Agenda: Fuller's Replies
58
(i).
The Fidelity Frame
58
(ii).
Diagnosing the Impasse
60
(iii).
Moralities External and Internal
63
(iv).
The Incompleteness of Positivism
65
II.
Reclaiming Fuller through the Nazi Law Debate
66
A.
Nazi Law according to Hart
66
B.
Nazi Law according to Fuller
68
C.
Analysis: Reading Fuller through the Nazi Law Debate
72
(i).
Defending a Distinctive Natural Law Analysis
72
(ii).
Positivism and Legal Pathology
73
(iii).
The Turn to the Subject
75
(iv).
Validity and Existence
76
III.
Fuller and Legal Validity
78
IV.
Conclusion
84
4.
The Morality of Law
86
I.
Mapping The Morality of Law
88
A.
The Story of King Rex
88
B.
Situating Fuller's Claims
92
C.
Conception of the Person Implicit in Legality
97
II.
Hart's Review of The Morality of Law
102
A.
Mapping Hart's Response
102
B.
Efficacy and Trusteeship
105
C.
Lessons from a Tyrant?
108
III.
A Different Path?
111
IV.
Conclusion
115
5.
The Reply to Critics
118
I.
Mapping the `Reply to Critics'
123
A.
`The Structure of Analytical Legal Positivism'
124
B.
`Is Some Minimum Respect for the Principles of Legality Essential to the Existence of a Legal System?'
125
C.
`Do the Principles of Legality Constitute an "Internal Morality of Law"?'
126
Distinction between Law and Managerial Direction
127
D.
`Some Implications of the Debate'
130
II.
Generality, Efficacy and Agency: Insights from the Archive
131
III.
Reflections on the `Reply to Critics'
135
IV.
Conclusion
138
6.
Resituating Fuller I: Raz
141
I.
Fuller and Raz
144
II.
Raz on the Rule of Law
148
III.
Raz on Authority
154
IV.
Conclusion: Form, Agency and Authority
159
7.
Resituating Fuller II: Dworkin
161
I.
Fuller and Dworkin
161
II.
The 1965 Essays
163
III.
Dworkin's Project
166
IV.
Fuller, Dworkin and Interpretation
168
V.
Fuller, Dworkin and Methodology
174
VI.
Fuller, Dworkin and the Value of Legality
177
A.
Content and Moral Significance of Generality
181
B.
Form and Concepts of Law
186
VII.
Conclusion: Taking Form Seriously
188
8.
Three Conversations
190
I.
Morality
191
II.
Instrumentalism
193
III.
Legality
196
Fuller and Shapiro: A New Conversation?
198
IV.
Conclusion
203
Index
205