The Mauthausen trial : American military justice in Germany / Tomaz Jardim.
2012
KK73.5.D33 J37 2012 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
The Mauthausen trial : American military justice in Germany / Tomaz Jardim.
Published
Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2012.
Call Number
KK73.5.D33 J37 2012
ISBN
9780674061576 (hbk. : alk. paper)
0674061578 (hbk. : alk. paper)
0674061578 (hbk. : alk. paper)
Description
276 pages ; 22 cm
System Control No.
(OCoLC)708243796
Summary
"Shortly after 9:00 a.m. on May 27, 1947, the first of forty-nine men condemned to death for war crimes at Mauthausen concentration camp mounted the gallows at Landsberg prison near Munich. The mass execution that followed resulted from an American military trial conducted at Dachau in the spring of 1946 - a trial that lasted only thirty-six days and yet produced more death sentences than any other in American history.
The Mauthausen trial was part of a massive series of proceedings designed to judge and punish Nazi war criminals in the most expedient manner the law would allow. There was no doubt that the crimes had been monstrous. Yet despite meting out punishment to a group of incontestably guilty men, the Mauthausen trial reveals a troubling and seldom-recognized face of American postwar justice - one characterized by rapid proceedings, lax rules of evidence, and questionable interrogations.
Although the better-known Nuremberg trials are often regarded as epitomizing American judicial ideals, these trials were in fact the exception to the rule. Instead, as Tomaz Jardim convincingly demonstrates, the rough justice of the Mauthausen trial remains indicative of the most common - and yet least understood - American approach to war crimes prosecution. The Mauthausen Trial forces reflection on the implications of compromising legal standards in order to guarantee that guilty people do not walk free."--pub. desc.
The Mauthausen trial was part of a massive series of proceedings designed to judge and punish Nazi war criminals in the most expedient manner the law would allow. There was no doubt that the crimes had been monstrous. Yet despite meting out punishment to a group of incontestably guilty men, the Mauthausen trial reveals a troubling and seldom-recognized face of American postwar justice - one characterized by rapid proceedings, lax rules of evidence, and questionable interrogations.
Although the better-known Nuremberg trials are often regarded as epitomizing American judicial ideals, these trials were in fact the exception to the rule. Instead, as Tomaz Jardim convincingly demonstrates, the rough justice of the Mauthausen trial remains indicative of the most common - and yet least understood - American approach to war crimes prosecution. The Mauthausen Trial forces reflection on the implications of compromising legal standards in order to guarantee that guilty people do not walk free."--pub. desc.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 259-262) and index.
Record Appears in
Gift
Purchased from the income of the Edith L. Fisch Fund
Gift

The Arthur W. Diamond Law Library
Purchased from the income of the Edith L. Fisch Fund
Table of Contents
Introduction
1
1.
War Crimes Trials and the U.S. Army
10
2.
American Investigators at Mauthausen
51
3.
The Prosecution Crafts Its Case
87
4.
The Defendants in the Dock
115
5.
Judgment at Dachau
168
Conclusion
201
Appendix: The Mauthausen Trial Charge Sheet
219
Notes
223
Bibliography of Primary Sources
259
Acknowledgments
263
Index
265