Traditions and change in European administrative law / edited by Roberto Caranta and Anna Gerbrandy.
2011
KJC5571 .T73 2011 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Traditions and change in European administrative law / edited by Roberto Caranta and Anna Gerbrandy.
Published
Groningen : Europa Law Publishing, 2011.
Call Number
KJC5571 .T73 2011
ISBN
9789089520715 (pbk.)
9089520716 (pbk.)
9089520716 (pbk.)
Description
x, 335 pages ; 24 cm.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)662402473
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Record Appears in
Added Author
Table of Contents
Contents
v
ch. 1
Introduction / Anna Gerbrandy
1
1.
A Changing Society: Changing Traditions of Judicial Review?
3
2.
Two Models: Top-Down v. Bottom-Up
4
3.
A Comparison Between the Two Models
7
4.
Why Move Courts Away From Substantive Review and Let the `Field' Decide the Substance?
8
5.
The Research
11
6.
The Contributions in this Volume
13
7.
The Resulting General Picture
13
ch. 2
Evolving Patterns and Change in the EU Governance and their Consequences on Judicial Protection / Roberto Caranta
15
1.
Introduction
17
2.
The EU: An Experiment in the Rule of Law without Democracy
18
3.
The Theory and Practice of Judicial Review of Measures Taken by EU Institutions
21
3.1.
General
21
3.2.
Breaches of Formal and Procedural Rules
23
3.3.
Substantive Review
26
3.3.1.
CAP Cases
27
3.3.2.
Competition Cases
28
3.3.3.
Fight against Terrorism Cases
34
3.4.
What Developing Trends?
39
4.
Attempts at Dialogue with Civil Society, Citizens, and Market Operators
42
5.
Judicial Review over Measures taken Following Dialogue
49
6.
Conclusions
52
ch. 3
Administrative Law and the Dialogue Model in France. The Administrative Courts' Contribution / Anna Simonati
63
1.
Introduction
65
2.
Enquetes Publiques
66
2.1.
Elements and Legal Rules
66
2.2.
The Administrative Courts' Contribution
68
2.2.1.
Breach of Procedural Rules and Protection of Interests
68
2.2.2.
The Completeness of the Information: the Contents of the Dossier Submitted to Enquete
70
2.2.3.
The Enquete as an Example of Dialogue?
72
3.
Zones d'Amenagement Concerte
72
3.1.
Elements and Legal Rules
72
3.2.
The Administrative Courts' Contribution
74
3.2.1.
The Creation of a Z.A.C.: Selfbinding Obligation for Public Authorities?
74
3.2.2.
The Legal Link between Public Law Decision and Convention d'Amenagement
76
3.2.3.
The Z.A.C. as an Example of Dialogue?
79
4.
The Prefet as a `Dialogue Model Promoter'
79
4.1.
Legal Rules and Institutional Role
79
4.2.
The Administrative Courts' Contribution
80
4.3.
The Prefet's Preference for Dialogue
82
5.
Final Observations
82
ch. 4
Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Procedure vs. Substance. Germany / Margherita Poto
93
1.
Brief Introductory Remarks
95
1.2.
The Discretionary Powers in the Rechtsstaat
96
2.
Social Welfare in the Constitution
97
3.
Judicial Review and Different Techniques
100
4.
The Influence of Private Law
103
4.1.
Public Administration and Private Tools
103
4.2.1.
An Example of Participative Democracy: Mediation in the Public Sector
103
4.2.2.
Negotiations and Cooperative Administrative Activity
105
4.2.3.
Criticism of Informal Settlements
105
4.2.4.
The Way Forward
107
4.2.5.
Practical Experiences with Assisted Negotiation
108
4.2.6.
Admissibility of Negotiations
108
4.2.7.
The Circle of Participants
109
4.2.8.
Access to Information
110
4.2.9.
The Use of Mediators
110
4.2.10.
Implementation of the Consensus
111
5.
The Judicial Review
112
6.
Procedural Guarantees Provided Within the Traditional Model
112
7.
The Proportionality Principle
116
8.
Examples of Dialoguing Administration
118
8.1.
The E-participation: A Successful Model in Germany
118
9.
Conclusions
119
ch. 5
Traditional Model vs. Dialogue Model in UK Legal System / Silvia Mirate
125
1.
Introduction
127
2.
What is a `Public Authority' in English Law?
128
3.
The Traditional Model: Judicial Review and the Control on the Form and the Substance of the Administrative Action
132
4.
Procedural Impropriety
133
4.1.
Procedural Fairness and Participation as Consultation: The Public Inquiries
136
4.2.
Form and Substance in the Protection of the Legitimate Expectations
138
5.
Substantive Review: the Control on the Discretion and the Ground of Illegality
140
5.1.
Substantive Review: From the Ground of Irrationality to the Proportionality Test
142
6.
The Growing `Dialogue-model' in English Public Administration
145
7.
Judicial Review Meets the New `Dialogue Model' of Public Administration: What's the Role of the English Courts?
150
8.
The `Dialogue-model' Outside the Judicial Review: other Ways of Controlling the Administrative Action
154
9.
Final Remarks
157
ch. 6
Traditional Variations in the Dutch Administrative Judicial System / M.J.M. Verhoeven
163
1.
Administrative Judicial Protection in the Netherlands
165
2.
The Preliminary Administrative Procedure
166
3.
Proceedings Before the Administrative Court
168
4.
Judicial Review of Discretionary Powers and Competences Liees
170
5.
Finalising Disputes Before the Court
171
6.
The Principle Duty of Enforcement
179
7.
Conclusions
183
ch. 7
Romanian Administrative Law between Tradition and Dialogue / Raluca Veliscu
189
1.
Introduction
191
2.
The Romanian Administrative Law System: A Short Introduction
191
3.
Bound Competence and Discretion --- The Traditional Model in Romanian Doctrine
193
4.
Traditional Techniques of Judicial Review
197
4.1.
Subjective and Objective Review
197
4.2.
Subjective Review
197
4.3.
Objective Review
198
4.4.
Grounds for Annulment
199
4.5.
An Atypical Review Technique
199
4.6.
Review by Exception. The Plea of Illegality
200
4.8.
Motivation (Duty to Give Reasons)
203
4.9.
Hearings
203
4.10.
Rulemaking and Adjudication
204
4.11.
Presumption of Validity
205
4.12.
Parties in procedure
205
5.
The `Traditional' and the `Dialogue' model
207
5.1.
Internal Administrative Appeals
208
5.1.1.
An Invitation to Dialogue: The Prefect as Controller/Mediator
208
5.1.2.
An Opportunity for Dialogue: Administrative Appeals Lodged by Citizens and Legal Persons
210
5.1.3.
Another Opportunity for Dialogue: Granting Compensation in Administrative Appeals?
212
5.2.
Mediation and Judicial Agreements
213
5.3.
Public --- Private Partnerships as a Dialogue Tool
216
5.4.
Participation in Decision-Making as an Instrument for Advancing the Dialogue Model
218
5.4.1.
Procedural Transparency in Local Public Administration: An Instance of the Dialogue Model, or Merely Legal Compliance?
218
5.5.
Zoning Agreements --- Effective Dialogue or a Path to Corruption?
221
5.6.
Associations of Community Development as a Public-Public Dialogue Model
223
5.7.
Public Authorities that Combine to a Certain Degree the Traditional Model and the Dialogue Model in Their Activity
225
5.7.1.
The Economic and Social Council (ESC)
225
5.7.2.
National Council of the Audiovisual (NCA)
226
5.7.3.
The Romanian Agency for the Assurance of Quality for Higher Education (RAAQHE)
227
5.7.4.
Territorial Authority for Public Safety (TAPS)
227
5.7.5.
The National Council against Discrimination (NCAD)
228
6.
Conclusions
228
ch. 8
The Dialogue Model in the Italian Legal System / Simona Rodriquez
237
1.
The Form of Participation as Introduced by the Administrative Procedure Act No. 241/1990: An Example of the Traditional Model
239
2.
The `Administration by Agreements'
244
3.
Local Government and Dialogue Model: The `Negotiated Planning' and the Tool of `Territorial Pacts'
247
4.
The Voluntary Agreements (VAs) and the Environmental Policy in Italy: Introductory Remarks
249
4.1.
The Voluntary Agreements: Brief Remarks on the Environmental Policy in the EU
250
4.2.
Voluntary Agreements and Waste Management in Italy: from the `Ronchi Decree' to the New Environmental Code
252
5.
Final Remarks
255
ch. 9
Traditional Model vs. Dialogue Model in US Legal System / Simona Rodriquez
267
1.
Introductory Remarks on American Administrative Law: The Traditional Model
269
2.
The Traditional Forms of Agency Decisionmaking: Rulemaking and Adjudication. Formal and/or Procedural Rules to Limit the Risk of Arbitrariness
270
2.1.
Rule-Making
271
2.2.
Adjudication
272
3.
The Abuse of Discretion and the Duty to Give Reasons
273
4.
Judicial Review on Discretion
276
5.
The `Arbitrary and Capricious Test'
279
6.
The Dialogue Model in US Legal System: Introductory Remarks
282
7.
The Case of Negotiated Rulemaking: A Combination Between the Traditional Model and the Dialogue Model
283
7.1.
Procedure of Neg-Reg
285
7.2.
Judicial Review in Neg-Reg Cases
286
7.3.
Neg-Reg and Scholars' Opinion
288
8.
The Case of Environmental Mediation
289
9.
Negotiated Settlements: Forms of Regulation of Public Utilities
291
10.
Final Remarks: Traditional Model vs. Dialogue Model
293
ch. 10
Models of Judicial Review. The Search for Instances of the Dialogue-Model of Judicial Review in the USA or: USA, Part II / Anna Gerbrandy
305
1.
Introduction
307
2.
A Search for the Dialogue Model in the USA
309
3.
Consent Decrees
310
3.1.
Consent Decrees in Environmental Law
312
3.2.
Consent Decrees in Antitrust
314
4.
The Way of the Pontiac Radiator
318
5.
The Administrative Law Judge
320
6.
Conclusions
327