The Supreme Court and criminal procedure : the Warren Court revolution / Michal R. Belknap.
2011
KF9625 .B45 2011 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
The Supreme Court and criminal procedure : the Warren Court revolution / Michal R. Belknap.
Published
Washington, D.C. : CQ Press, [2011]
Copyright
©2011
Call Number
KF9625 .B45 2011
ISBN
9780872897748 (hbk. : alk. paper)
0872897745 (hbk. : alk. paper)
9781604266573
1604266570
0872897745 (hbk. : alk. paper)
9781604266573
1604266570
Description
xv, 416 pages ; cm.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)462906686
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Available in Other Form
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
xi
Foreword
xiii
Introduction
1
The Pre-1961 Period
1
The Fair Trial Approach
4
Important Only in Federal Criminal Cases
8
The Revolution Begins
11
The Right to Counsel
23
Extending the Right to Counsel
26
Confessions
28
Origins of the Miranda Warnings
33
The Miranda Warnings
35
Habeas Corpus
39
Criminal Defendants and the News Media
42
Soft on Crime?
44
Turn to the Right
46
The Structure of the Book
52
1.
The Exclusionary Rule
63
The Exclusionary Rule
63
Evolution of the Exclusionary Rule
64
The Burger Court
65
The Good Faith Exception
69
Further Restriction by the Rehnquist Court
72
Congressional Attacks on the Exclusionary Rule
75
The Roberts Court
76
Commentary
77
Documents
Supreme Court Opinions
1.1.
Court Applies Exclusionary Rule to States in Mapp v. Ohio, June 19, 1961
78
1.2.
Court Rules on "Stop and Frisk" in Terry v. Ohio, June 10, 1968
93
Executive and Congressional Materials
1.3.
Final Report of the President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, December 1982
106
1.4.
Rep. William McCollum Proposes Exclusionary Rule Reform, January 25, 1995
109
Law Journal Articles
1.5.
Report on the Effects of Mapp on Misdemeanor Narcotics Cases in New York City, 1968
111
1.6.
Scholar Argues That the Exclusionary Rule Is Not Effective at Prventing Unreasonable Searches and Seizures, 1969-1970
117
1.7.
Report on the Impact of the Exclusionary Rule, 1973-1974
129
1.8.
Costs of the Exclusionary Rule, 1981-1982
140
Police Department Procedural Manuals
1.9.
Michigan Police Law Manual, 1937
145
1.10.
San Diego Police Department Rules and Regulations, 1949
147
1.11.
Los Angeles Police Department on How to Search a Car, 1958
148
1.12.
Indiana Sheriff's Manual of Law and Practice, 1959
148
1.13.
San Diego Police Department Field Interrogation Manual, 1959 and 1960
150
1.14.
Michigan Police Law Manual, 1966
151
1.15.
San Diego Police Department Rules and Regulations, Procedures and Conduct, 1968
155
1.16.
Basic Police Procedures: A Manual for Georgia Peace Officers, 1968
155
1.17.
Portland, Oregon, Police Bureau Manual of Rules and procedures, 1969
157
1.18.
Police Law Instructor's Manual, 1969
158
2.
The Right to Counsel
171
The Evolving Law on the Right to Counsel
172
Ineffectiveness of the Right to Counsel
182
2.1.
Court Extends Right to Counsel to State Criminal Trials, March 18, 1963
184
2.2.
Supreme Court Extends Gideon Protections to Minor Criminal Offenses, June 12, 1972
190
2.3.
Analysis of the Steps taken to Implement Gideon, 1965
197
2.4.
Analysis of the Quality of Legal Assistance Provided to Indigent Defendants, 1970
202
2.5.
Analysis of the Effectiveness of Public Defender and Appointed Counsel Systems, 1973
211
2.6.
Analysis of Findings on the State of Public Defense in California, 2009
218
3.
The Miranda Warnings: Constitutional Protection for Those Undergoing Police Interrogation
225
Basis of the Miranda Rules
225
Miranda v. Arizona
226
Interpreting Miranda
227
When the Warnings Must Be Given
233
Miranda Rights Waivers
233
What Constitutes an Invocation of Miranda Rights
237
When Miranda Applies
237
The Effort to Eliminate Miranda
238
Effectiveness of Miranda Warnings
240
Impact of Miranda
242
3.1.
Supreme Court Rules Narrowly on the Right to Counsel in Escobedo v. Illinois, June 22, 1964
244
3.2.
Supreme Court Requires Rights Be Read to Accused in Miranda v. Arizona, June 13, 1966
252
Legislation
3.3.
President Johnson Signs Landmark Anticrime Legislation, June 19, 1968
270
3.4.
Study on the Impact of Dorado on Prosecutions in Los Angeles, 1966-1967
272
3.5.
Study on the Impact of Miranda on New Haven Law Enforcement, 1966-1967
274
3.6.
Study Finds Significant Impact of Miranda on Investigations, 1968
296
3.7.
Study of Defendants and Lawyers in the Wake of Miranda, 1966-1967
315
3.8.
Study on the Effect of Miranda on Confession Rates in Pittsburgh, 1967
327
3.9.
San Diego Police Department Rules and Regulations, 1949
335
3.10.
San Diego Police Department Rules and Regulations: Interrogation, 1960
336
3.11.
California "Elements of Interrogation," 1963
337
3.12.
Pittsburgh Police Law Instructor's Manual, 1969
350
3.13.
Phoenix Police Department General Patrol Procedures, January 1, 1971
356
4.
Public Reaction against the Warren Court
361
Critics of the Court
361
The Law and Order Issue
363
Popular Media
4.1.
Politicians and Cops Both Support Arrests for Investigation, July 27, 1962
365
4.2.
New York Police Chief Criticizes Supreme Court, May 14, 1965
367
4.3.
Experts Debate the Warren Court's Rulings, March 1966
368
4.4.
Attorneys General Say Confession Rule Has Not Harmed Law Enforcement, May 18, 1966
384
4.5.
Police Commissioner Predicts Miranda Will Cause Decline in Law and Order, June 15, 1966
385
4.6.
Most Major Police Departments Anticipated the Miranda Rules, June 20, 1966
387
4.7.
U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Criticizes Miranda, August 6, 1966
390
4.8.
Perspective of a Dissenting Detective, August 13, 1966
392
4.9.
Attorney General Ramsey Clark Denies Supreme Court Restrictions Hurt Law Enforcement, May 1, 1967
394
4.10.
Cops Use Perjury to Thwart Judge-Made Rules, May 8, 1967
395
4.11.
Public Thinks Supreme Court Too Soft on Criminals, March 3, 1968
397
4.12.
Voters Seeking Restoration of Law and Order, September 10, 1968
399
4.13.
FBI Director Hoover Criticizes Courts, March 1, 1969
400
4.14.
Gallup Poll Shows Declining Support for Supreme Court, June 15, 1969
401
Index
405