Administrative tribunals and adjudication / Peter Cane.
2009
K3410 .C36 2009 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Administrative tribunals and adjudication / Peter Cane.
Published
Oxford ; Portland, Ore : Hart Pub., 2009.
Call Number
K3410 .C36 2009
ISBN
9781841130095 (cloth)
1841130095 (cloth)
1841130095 (cloth)
Description
xxvi, 285 pages ; 24 cm
System Control No.
(OCoLC)303096683
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Preface
vii
Abbreviations
xv
Table of Cases
xvii
Table of Legislation
xxiii
1.
Survey
1
1.1.
The Project
1
1.2.
Administrative Tribunals and Administrative Adjudication
2
1.2.1.
The AAT is not a court
3
1.2.2.
The AAT reviews decisions
6
1.2.3.
The AAT's jurisdiction
16
1.3.
The Plan of the Book
18
1.4.
Conclusion
21
2.
History
23
2.1.
Introduction
23
2.2.
1066 to 1800
24
2.3.
19th and 20th Centuries
30
2.3.1.
The UK
30
2.3.2.
The US
48
2.3.3.
Australia
57
2.4.
Conclusion
67
3.
Models
69
3.1.
The UK Model
69
3.2.
The US Model
72
3.3.
The Australian Model
82
3.4.
The French Model
86
3.5.
Conclusion
90
4.
Form
91
4.1.
Membership, Appointments and Composition
91
4.1.1.
Membership
91
4.1.1.1.
Expertise and Specialisation
91
4.1.1.2.
The US
93
4.1.1.3.
The UK
94
4.1.1.4.
Australia
96
4.1.1.5.
The Tasks of Non-court Administrative Adjudicators
97
4.1.2.
Appointment Processes
98
4.1.2.1.
Who Appoints and How?
98
4.1.2.2.
Terms and Conditions of Service
101
4.1.3.
Composition
103
4.2.
Separation and Independence
105
4.2.1.
The UK
108
4.2.2.
Australia
110
4.2.3.
The US
113
4.3.
Structure and Systematisation
114
4.3.1.
Jurisdictional Specialisation
114
4.3.1.1.
Patterns of Specialisation
115
4.3.1.2.
The Theory of Specialisation and Amalgamation
124
4.3.2.
Supervision and Accountability
128
4.3.2.1.
Hierarchical Supervision
129
4.3.2.2.
External Supervision
131
4.4.
Conclusion
137
5.
Function
139
5.1.
Introduction
139
5.2.
Categorising Governance Functions: the Legacy of Montesquieu
140
5.3.
Merits Review
144
5.3.1.
Merits Review is a Mode of Review
144
5.3.2.
The Substantive Element of Merits Review
145
5.3.2.1.
The ̀Correct or Preferable' Formula
145
5.3.2.2.
The Basis of Merits Review
149
5.3.3.
The Procedural Element of Merits Review
169
5.3.4.
The Remedial Element of Merits Review
173
5.4.
Merits Review and Judicial Review
176
5.5.
The Ǹormative Function' of Merits Review and the AAT
182
5.6.
Merits Review Outside the AAT
188
5.7.
The Nature of Tribunal Review in Comparator Jurisdictions
192
5.7.1.
The UK
192
5.7.2.
The US
200
5.7.3.
France
204
5.8.
Conclusion
207
6.
Purpose
209
6.1.
What is Administrative Justice?
209
6.2.
A Formula for Administrative Justice in Tribunals?
218
6.3.
Jurisdiction
220
6.4.
Standing
229
6.5.
Processes
233
6.5.1.
The Paradigm Mode of Decision-Making
236
6.5.1.1.
The Reviewer
238
6.5.1.2.
The Respondent
244
6.5.1.3.
The Applicant
245
6.5.2.
Alternatives to the Paradigm Mode
246
6.6.
Resources
251
6.7.
Conclusion
253
7.
Landscape
255
7.1.
The Accountability S̀ector'
255
7.2.
Tribunals and Ombudsmen
259
7.3.
Tribunals and Internal Review
263
7.4.
Tribunals and Courts
266
7.4.1.
Australia
267
7.4.2.
The US
268
7.4.3.
The UK
269
7.4.4.
Re-conceiving the Relationship Between Courts and Tribunals
271
7.5.
Tribunals and ADR/PDR
272
7.6.
Conclusion
274
Index
275