Evidence : cases and materials / by Roger C. Park, Richard D. Friedman.
2013
KF8935 .P37 2013 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Evidence : cases and materials / by Roger C. Park, Richard D. Friedman.
Published
New York, NY : Foundation Press, 2013.
Call Number
KF8935 .P37 2013
Edition
Twelfth edition.
ISBN
9781609301385
1609301382
9781609301392 (pbk. ; teacher's manual)
1609301390 (pbk. ; teacher's manual)
1609301382
9781609301392 (pbk. ; teacher's manual)
1609301390 (pbk. ; teacher's manual)
Description
xxxiv, 1,526 pages ; 27 cm + teacher's manual.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)859252533
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Record Appears in
Local Note
Library lacks teacher's manual.
Table of Contents
Preface To Twelfth Edition
v
Table Of Cases
xix
Table Of California Evidence Code Sections
xxxi
Table Of Federal Evidence Rules
xxxiii
ch. 1
Making the Record; Trial Objections
1
ch. 2
Relevance and Its Counterweights
79
A.
Relevance to What?
79
The Judgment of Solomon
79
Hart and McNaughton, Evidence and Inference in the Law
80
James, Relevancy, Probability and the Law
82
B.
Relevance and Inference
84
McCormick's Handbook on the Law of Evidence
84
Note: Assessing the Entire Body of Evidence
85
Knapp v. State
86
Sherrod v. Berry
88
C.
Probative Value Versus Prejudicial Effect
88
Old Chief v. United States
88
Ballou v. Henri Studios, Inc
97
Hypotheticals
100
Holmes v. South Carolina
101
Fighting Fire With Fire: Inadmissible Evidence as Opening the Door
106
Note
108
Clark v. State
108
D.
Character and Habit
108
1.
Character in Issue
108
Cleghorn v. New York Central & H. River Ry. Co
108
Wellman, The Art of Cross-Examination
109
Comment on Federal Rule of Evidence 405(b)
110
Hypothetical
111
2.
Character as Circumstantial Evidence
111
Michelson v. United States
111
Note
118
Camus, The Stranger
119
A.L.I., Model Penal Code
120
Maryland-District of Columbia-Virginia Criminal Practice Institute Trial Manual
120
Question
121
Theodore Roosevelt as Character Witness
121
Question
125
McCormick's Handbook on the Law of Evidence
125
Hypotheticals
131
United States v. Carrillo
132
California Constitution Art. 1, [§] 28 (Proposition 8)
135
Note
135
United States v. Beasley
136
United States v. Cunningham
140
Tucker v. State
143
Huddleston v. United States
144
Note: Other Crime Evidence Offered Against a Defendant Who Was Acquitted of the Other Offense
149
Perrin v. Anderson
150
Note
154
Questions
154
Park, Leonard, Orenstein & Goldberg, Evidence Law
155
Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc
157
Hypotheticals
160
Note on Rape Shield Legislation
162
State v. Cassidy
163
Olden v. Kentucky
166
Note
170
United States v. Platero
170
Johnson v. Elk Lake School District
171
Note
176
Roger C. Park, Character at the Crossroads
176
Questions
179
E.
Similar Happenings
179
Simon v. Kennebunkport
179
Morris, Studies in the Law of Torts
181
Hypothetical
182
F.
Subsequent Precautions
182
Tuer v. McDonald
182
Hypotheticals
192
G.
Offers in Compromise
192
Davidson v. Prince
192
Note
195
Hypotheticals
195
ch. 3
The Hearsay Rule and the Confrontation Right
197
A.
Rationales and Meanings: Definitions
197
John George Phillimore, History and Principles of the Law of Evidence
197
Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay
199
Park, Two Definitions of Hearsay*
201
McCormick's Handbook on the Law of Evidence
202
Estate of Murdock
203
Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor
207
Vinyard v. Vinyard Funeral Home, Inc
208
Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital
209
Ries Biologicals, Inc. v. Bank of Santa Fe
211
Strahorn, A Reconsideration of the Hearsay Rule and Admissions
212
Fun-Damental Too, Ltd. v. Gemmy Industries Corp
212
United States v. Hernandez
214
Hypotheticals
215
United States v. Zenni
216
Note
221
Commonwealth v. Knapp
221
Morton, The Rothschilds*
222
Sending a Message about Canadian Beef
223
McCormick, The Borderland of Hearsay
223
Wilson v. Clancy
226
Question
227
Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence
228
United States v. Jaramillo-Suarez
228
United States v. Rhodes
230
Lilly, An Introduction to the Law of Evidence
231
United States v. Brown
232
City of Webster Groves v. Quick
234
Morgan, Hearsay and Non-Hearsay
235
Problems
236
Morgan, Evidence Exam, Summer Term, 1946, Harvard Law School
236
Crawford v. Washington
240
B.
Exceptions and Exemptions
250
1.
Admissions
250
Reed v. McCord
250
Notes
251
United States v. Hoosier
252
La Buy, Jury Instructions in Federal Criminal Cases
254
The Gospel According to Luke
254
Stephen Birmingham, "Our Crowd"
254
Admission by Silence-Another View
255
State v. Carlson
255
Question
259
Hypotheticals
259
La Buy, Jury Instructions in Federal Criminal Cases
259
Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc
260
Hypotheticals
264
Big Mack Trucking Co., Inc. v. Dickerson
264
Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co
268
United States v. DiDomenico
271
United States v. Goldberg
272
United States v. Doerr
273
Questions
275
Bourjaily v. United States
275
Questions
280
2.
Spontaneous and Contemporaneous Exclamations
281
Hutchins & Slesinger, Some Observations on the Law of Evidence
281
Truck Insurance Exchange v. Michling
285
Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical Center
287
State v. Jones
289
Hypotheticals
295
Davis v. Washington
296
Michigan v. Bryant
304
3.
State of Mind
315
Adkins v. Brett
315
Hypotheticals
320
Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hillmon
321
Shepard v. United States
323
Question
326
Hypotheticals on Statements by Homicide Victims
326
United States v. Pheaster
327
Question
332
Hypotheticals
332
Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers Imports, Inc
333
Hypotheticals
338
4.
Medical Diagnosis or Treatment
339
United States v. Tome
339
Questions
344
5.
Former Testimony
344
Travelers Fire Insurance Co. v. Wright
344
Note-Issue Preclusion
347
Note on the Concept of Predecessor in Interest
349
United States v. Salerno
349
Hypotheticals
353
6.
Declarations Against Interest
355
State v. English
355
G.M. McKelvey Co. v. General Casualty Co. of America
357
United States v. Barrett
358
Questions
363
Williamson v. United States
364
Questions
367
Hypotheticals
367
7.
Dying Declaration's and Forfeiture
369
Cairns, Law and the Social Sciences
369
R. v. Perry
371
Question
372
State v. Williams
372
Garza v. Delta Tau Delta Fraternity National
374
Questions
376
Hypotheticals
377
Roger W. Kirst, Does Crawford Provide a Stable Foundation for Confrontation Doctrine?
377
Richard D. Friedman, Confrontation and the Definition of Chutzpa
378
Question
379
Giles v. California
379
8.
Prior Identification
386
Weinstein's Evidence
386
Hypotheticals
387
United States v. Owens
388
Hypotheticals
391
9.
Past Recollection Recorded
392
Baker v. State
392
Adams v. The New York Central Railroad Co
398
Note
403
Hypothetical
403
10.
Business and Public Records
404
Maryland-District of Columbia-Virginia Criminal Practice Institute Trial Manual
404
Johnson v. Lutz
405
United States v. Vigneau
407
Hypotheticals
411
United States v. Duncan
412
Hypotheticals
414
Williams v. Alexander
414
Hahnemann University Hospital v. Dudnick
419
Potamkin Cadillac Corp. v. B.R.I. Coverage Corp
421
Palmer v. Hoffman
421
Lewis v. Baker
423
Sana v. Hawaiian Cruises, Ltd
426
Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey
430
Richard D. Friedman, The Sky is Still Not Falling
435
Williams v. Illinois
439
Hypothetical
461
United States v. Grady
462
Question
463
Hypotheticals
463
11.
Miscellaneous Exceptions
465
a.
Prior Judgments
465
Stroud v. Cook
465
Comment to Calif.Evid.Code [§] 1301
468
b.
Treatises and Other Professional Literature
468
Wellman, The Art of Cross-Examination
468
c.
Statements Describing Child Abuse or Spousal Abuse
470
12.
The Residual Exception and Possibilities for Future Reform
471
McCormick, Law and the Future: Evidence
471
Questions
471
The British Solution for Civil Cases
472
Turbyfill v. International Harvester Co
472
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd
474
Emerging Problems Under the Federal Rules of Evidence
477
Hypotheticals
480
C.
A Recap
480
McNaughton, Evidence Exam, Harvard Law School, First Semester, 1960-1961
480
Question
484
ch. 4
Impeachment and Rehabilitation; Cross-Examination
485
A.
Impeaching One's Own Witness and Other Forensic Problems
485
Kaplan and Waltz, The Trial of Jack Ruby
485
Mathew, Forensic Fables by 0
486
Susanna and the Elders
486
Gilbert Without Sullivan
488
Mathew, Forensic Fables by 0
489
United States v. Hogan
490
Ohio Rules of Evidence, 2003
494
B.
Methods of Impeachment
494
1.
Impeachment by Contradiction
494
State v. Oswalt
494
Questions
496
United States v. Copelin
497
2.
Character of the Witness
501
a.
Prior Bad Acts
501
United States v. Owens
501
An Illustration: Cross-Examination Well Prepared and Executed
505
Aron Steuer, Max D. Steuer: Trial Lawyer
508
Note: Extrinsic Evidence Under Fed. R. Evid. 608(b)
509
Questions
510
United States v. Drake
511
United States v. Saada
515
b.
Prior Convictions
518
Reasoning About Defoe
518
United States v. Sanders
518
Note
523
California Constitution Art. 1, [§] 28
524
Notes
524
United States v. Brackeen
527
Hypotheticals
530
Luce v. United States
531
Note
533
c.
Bad Reputation for Truth and Veracity
534
O'Malley, Grenig & Lee, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions: Criminal
534
Questions
534
Hypothetical
535
3.
Psychiatric Condition
535
United States v. Lindstrom
535
Hypotheticals
538
The Testimony of Dr. Binger
539
Witness' Claim That He Once Was Harlow Cast a Reasonable Doubt
541
Hypothetical
542
4.
Prior Statements to Impeach or Rehabilitate
542
Coles v. Harsch
542
Goldstein, Trial Technique
544
Park, Leonard, Orenstein & Goldberg, Evidence Law
545
Morgan, Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept
546
Tome v. United States
547
Minnesota Rules of Evidence (1998)
553
Questions
553
Hypotheticals
553
5.
Bias
554
United States v. Abel
554
Waltz, Introduction to Criminal Evidence
559
Hypotheticals
560
ch. 5
Confidentiality and Confidential Communication
563
A.
The Attorney-Client Privilege
563
Jeremy Bentham, Rationale of Judicial Evidence
563
United States v. Woodruff
564
Upjohn Co. v. United States
566
Note on Federal Work Product Doctrine
572
City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court
573
Clark v. State
576
Restatement of the Law Third-The Law Governing Lawyers
580
United States v. Zolin
584
Swidler & Berlin v. United States
587
Hypotheticals
588
B.
Physician-Patient and Psychotherapist-Patient Privileges
590
Prink v. Rockefeller Center, Inc
590
Jaffee v. Redmond
593
People v. Sergio
601
Problem
607
Hypothetical
608
C.
The Marital Privileges
608
Trammel v. United States
608
Hypothetical
615
D.
Miscellaneous Privileges
615
1.
Clergy-Communicant Privilege
615
In re Grand Jury Investigation
615
2.
Accountant-Client Privilege
621
Note, Functional Overlap Between the Lawyer and Other Professionals: Its Implications for the Privileged Communications Doctrines
621
3.
Parent-Child Privilege
622
In re Grand Jury
622
4.
News-Person's Privilege
628
Matter of Farber
628
E.
Inadvertent Waiver
636
Peterson v. Bernardi
636
ch. 6
Governmental Privileges
641
United States v. Reynolds
641
Evidentiary Privilege of "State Secrets" In Contract Action
646
United States v. Nixon
648
Note
656
United States v. Tzannos
657
United States v. Moussaoui
664
Hypotheticals
666
ch. 7
Writings
669
A.
The Best Evidence Rule
669
McCormick, Evidence
669
Meyers v. United States
670
People v. Enskat
671
United States v. Diaz-Lopez
672
Dale A. Nance, The Best Evidence Principle
676
Question
679
B.
Authentication
679
McCormick, Evidence
679
United States v. Dockins
680
United States v. Hampton
682
Note
684
First State Bank of Denton v. Maryland Casualty Co
684
Note
686
Hypothetical
686
Griffin v. State
686
ch. 8
Competence of Witnesses
697
Hill v. Skinner
697
Problem
699
A Note on Competence
699
A Note on Competence, continued
704
Rock v. Arkansas
706
State v. Moore
713
Tanner v. United States
721
Hypotheticals
726
ch. 9
Judicial Notice
727
A.
Adjudicative Facts
727
De La Cruz v. City of Los Angeles
727
Fielding v. State
732
Comment, Judicial Notice by Appellate Courts of Facts and Foreign Laws Not Brought to the Attention of the Trial Court
734
B.
Law and Legislative Facts
734
Lilly, An Introduction to the Law of Evidence
734
McCormick on Evidence
735
Hypotheticals
739
C.
Jury Notice
739
Note
740
United States v. Amado-Nunez
741
ch. 10
The Burden of Proof and Presumptions
745
A.
Civil Cases
745
James, Civil Procedure
745
Smith v. Rapid Transit, Inc
750
Hart & McNaughton, Evidence and Inference in the Law
751
Dyer v. MacDougall
752
Maguire, Evidence: Common Sense and Common Law
759
Legille v. Dann
761
Note
765
Degnan, Syllabus on California Evidence Code
765
In re Nicholas H
769
Hypotheticals
772
B.
Criminal Cases
773
Virginia v. Black
773
ch. 11
Opinion, Expertise and Experts; Scientific and Demonstrative Evidence
783
A.
Opinion, Expertise and Experts
783
Maguire, Evidence: Common Sense and Common Law
783
Commonwealth v. Holden
785
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Knight
788
Waltz, Introduction to Criminal Evidence
789
Waltz & Inbau, Medical Jurisprudence
803
Note: Objections to the Form of Expert Testimony
804
Note
813
State v. Odom
814
United States v. Scop
820
Ingram v. McCuiston
825
Waltz, The New Federal Rules of Evidence: An Analysis
833
People v. Gardeley
833
United States v. Moore
841
United States v. Kristiansen
848
Reprise: "Fighting Fire With Fire"
851
Hypothetical
852
B.
Scientific and Demonstrative Evidence
852
The Case Against Expert Witnesses
852
Langbein, The German Advantage in Civil Procedure
857
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc
858
Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael
868
Ellis v. State
876
United States v. Saelee
877
Note
887
State v. Porter
887
United States v. Piccinonna
900
United States v. Scheffer
905
State v. Chapple
911
People v. Collins
923
Note
931
Dale A. Nance, Naturalized Epistemology and the Critique of Evidence Theory
932
Lempert, The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof
933
The Red-Haired Soldier
935
People v. Mountain
935
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 to 1 Odds
936
Questions
937
Note: DNA and Other Exonerations
937
Brown v. Farwell
938
Jonathan J. Koehler, DNA Matches and Statistics: Important Questions, Surprising Answers
941
Margaret A. Berger, Laboratory Error Seen Through the Lens of Science and Policy
955
Note
961
Questions on Probability and Proof
961
Houts, Photographic Misrepresentation
962
Waltz, Introduction to Criminal Evidence
964
Appendix A. Federal Rules of Evidence
971
Appendix B. Selected Legislative History of the Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates
1013
Appendix C. Appendix of Deleted and Superseded Materials With Notes
1253
Appendix D. Evidence Code
1299
Index
1509