Extraterritoriality and collective redress / edited by Duncan Fairgrieve, Eva Lein.
2012
K2243 .E98 2012 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Extraterritoriality and collective redress / edited by Duncan Fairgrieve, Eva Lein.
Published
Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press, 2012.
Call Number
K2243 .E98 2012
ISBN
9780199655724 (hbk.)
0199655723 (hbk.)
0199655723 (hbk.)
Description
xli, 447 pages ; 26 cm
System Control No.
(OCoLC)797975150
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Record Appears in
Added Author
Table of Contents
Editors
xiii
Contributors
xv
Table of Cases
xxiii
Table of Legislation
xxxiii
I.
COLLECTIVE REDRESS MECHANISMS IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
1.
Class Actions and Collective Actions / Diego Corapi
I.
Introduction
1
II.
The United States Model and Its Influence on Other Regimes
9
III.
Developments Within the United States Model
36
IV.
Conclusion
40
2.
Collective Redress Procedures: European Debates / Geraint Howells
II.
Developments at a National Level
13
III.
The EU Response
66
IV.
Conclusion
81
3.
Collective Action Reform in England and Wales / John Sorabji
II.
1987-2004: The Long Road to Reform
2
III.
2004-10: Flattering to Deceive, Reform's False Dawn
22
IV.
Conclusion
45
4.
Class Actions and Class Settlements Going Global: the Netherlands / Helene van Lith
II.
The Dutch System of Collective Redress
3
III.
Cross-border Mass Disputes-The WCAM Going Global
37
IV.
The Complementary Role of the WCAM
48
V.
Unanticipated Problems with Going Global
53
VI.
Recognition and Enforcement of United States Judgments
69
VII.
Conclusion
76
5.
Collective Redress: Policy Objectives and Practical Problems / Alexander Layton
II.
Policy Objectives
2
III.
Practical Problems
16
IV.
Conclusions
47
II.
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COLLECTIVE REDRESS
6.
A Coherent Approach to European Collective Redress / Burkhard Hess
II.
Different Perspectives and Objectives of Law-making
9
III.
Conclusion
30
7.
The Trouble with Cross-Border Collective Redress: Issues and Difficulties / Horatia Muir Watt
II.
Sources of Resistance
7
III.
New Directions?
12
8.
Cross-Border Collective Redress and Jurisdiction under Brussels I: A Mismatch / Eva Lein
II.
One Court for All: Concentration of Jurisdiction under Brussels I
7
III.
Too Many Courts Spoil the Broth: Dispersed Jurisdiction under Brussels I
16
IV.
The Magic Trick? Article 6(1) Brussels I Regulation
25
V.
Can the Parties Decide?
31
VI.
Conclusions and Perspectives
33
9.
Parallel Litigation and Cross-Border Collective Actions under the Brussels I Framework: Lessons from Abroad / Justine N. Stefanelli
II.
Lis Pendens and Related Actions under the Brussels I Regulation
5
III.
Collective Actions and Parallel Proceedings
13
IV.
Proposed Amendments to the Brussels I Regulation
23
V.
Suggestions for Reform
31
VI.
Conclusion
72
10.
The Impact of the Brussels I Enforcement and Recognition Rules on Collective Actions / Duncan Fairgrieve
II.
The Scheme of Brussels I
4
III.
The Notion of Ordre Public under Brussels I, Article 34(1)
18
IV.
Approach in Individual Member States: Public Policy and Collective Redress
26
V.
Article 34(2): Procedural Issues
55
VI.
Article 34(3): Irreconcilability
58
VII.
Conclusion
62
11.
Conflicts of Laws in Multinational Collective Actions-a Judicial Nightmare? / Astrid Stadler
II.
Choice of Law and European Mass Litigation
11
III.
Possible Solutions
35
IV.
Conclusion
57
12.
Extraterritoriality of Evidence Gathering in US Class Action Proceedings / Andrea Pinna
II.
The Scope of Extraterritoriality of United States Discovery
8
III.
The Conflict between Extraterritorial United States Discovery Rules and Foreign Laws
38
IV.
Conclusion
55
13.
The ILA Rio Resolution on Transnational Group Actions / Catherine Kessedjian
II.
The Resolution of the 2008 ILA Rio de Janeiro Conference
4
III.
Factors Determining the Type of Procedure
8
IV.
Analysis of the Resolution
20
V.
Conclusion
41
14.
In Defence of the Requirement for Foreign Class Members to Opt In to an English Class Action / Rachael Mulheron
II.
The Draft Statutory Framework
4
III.
Requiring Non-domiciled Class Members to Opt In: Key Canadian Precedent
15
IV.
Further Support Derived from Some Key United States Decisions
33
V.
Conclusion
55
III.
RECEPTION OF FOREIGN COLLECTIVE REDRESS AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES DECISION IN NATIONAL JURISDICTIONS
15.
Foreign Punitive Damages Decisions and Class Actions in Italy / Francesco Quarta
II.
Compatibility of US Class Action Procedure with European Jurisprudence
3
III.
Conclusion
40
16.
The Perils of Certifying International Class Actions in Canada / John P. Brown
II.
Traditional Judgment Recognition Rules Are Inadequate for Enforcing Multi-jurisdictional Class Action Judgments
10
III.
Why the `Real and Substantial Connection' Test Should Not Be Applied to Absent Foreign Claimants
15
IV.
The `Real and Substantial Connection' Test-Applied Rigorously
28
V.
Canadian Courts Should Not Certify Multi-jurisdictional Opt-out Classes
47
VI.
Conclusion
75
17.
Collective Redress in Spain: Recognition and Enforcement of Class Action Judgments and Class Settlements / Marta Otero Crespo
II.
Collective Redress in Spain
4
III.
Recognition and Enforcement in Spain
22
IV.
Conclusion
65
IV.
EXTRATERRITORIALITY AND US LAW
18.
Morrison v National Australia Bank: The US Supreme Court Limits Collective Redress for Securities Fraud / Thomas A. Dubbs
II.
The Facts of Morrison
5
III.
The Court's Opinion and the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality
48
IV.
Conclusion
86
19.
Morrison v National Australia Bank: Implications for Global Securities Class Actions / Linda J. Silberman
II.
Background of Morrison
2
III.
The Morrison Decision
3
IV.
The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality in Morrison
7
V.
The Influence of Comity Concerns in Morrison
12
VI.
Implications for Global Class Actions Post-Morrison
17
VII.
Conclusion
39
20.
Morrison v National Australia Bank: Foreign Securities and the Jurisdiction to Prescribe / Adam Johnson
II.
Choice of Law and Jurisdiction
5
III.
International Jurisdiction
6
IV.
Extraterritorial Application of United States Law
14
V.
International Comity and the Approach in England
20
VI.
Conclusion
28
21.
`Bridging the Gap': Contrasting Effects of US Supreme Court Territorial Restraint on European Collective Claims / Vincent Smith
I.
Introduction: Morrison and Empagran
1
II.
How Might this New Situation Affect Collective Claims in Europe?
21
III.
Conclusion: Increasing Collective Claims in Europe?
33
22.
Transnational Issuer Liability after the Financial Crisis: Seeking a Coherent Choice of Law Standard / Alexander Hellgardt
II.
International Securities Class Actions
9
III.
Classification of Primary Capital Markets Duties
15
IV.
Current State of the Conflict of Laws Discussion
23
V.
Suggested Solution: Synchronism between Duties and Liability
42
VI.
Implications
69
VII.
Conclusion
75
Index
431