The horizontal effect revolution and the question of sovereignty / Johan van der Walt.
2014
KJC5132 .V359 2014 (Map It)
On loan from Cellar, due 22. Dec 2025
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
The horizontal effect revolution and the question of sovereignty / Johan van der Walt.
Published
Berlin : De Gruyter, [2014]
Call Number
KJC5132 .V359 2014
ISBN
9783110248029 (hd.bd.)
3110248026 (hd.bd.)
9783110248036 (online)
3110248026 (hd.bd.)
9783110248036 (online)
Description
xxii, 428 pages ; 24 cm
System Control No.
(OCoLC)888956448
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 401-418) and indexes.
Available in Other Form
9783110248036 (online)
(GyWOH)har110064312
(GyWOH)har110064312
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements and Disclaimers
xix
Introduction
1
I.
The Horizontality Revolution
1
II.
Two Histories, Four Questions, Twelve Cases, Two Scholarly Debates
6
III.
Liberal Democratic Constitutionalism
13
IV.
Liberal Democratic Sovereignty
19
V.
Liberal Democratic Historicity
21
VI.
Liberal Democratic Constitutional Review
25
VII.
Outline of Arguments and Chapters
31
Part One: Horizontal Effect
ch. One
Erased Baselines and Inversed Coordinates: 19th Century Backgrounds of the Horizontality Question
37
I.
Introduction
37
II.
The Privatisation of Constitutional Rights in America
41
III.
The Nineteenth Century Transformation of Private Law Rights in America
48
IV.
The Privatisation of Constitutional Rights in Germany
59
V.
The Nineteenth Century Transformation of Private Law Rights in Germany and its Impact on Early Twentieth Century German Public Law
66
VI.
The Baseline of Erased Baselines
74
VII.
Inversed Coordinates
78
ch. Two
Twelve Pivotal Cases
85
I.
Introduction
85
II.
The Civil Rights Cases (and their Unlikely South African Echoes)
86
III.
Shelley v Kraemer
92
IV.
Labour v Swing and New York Times v Sullivan
98
V.
RWDSU v Dolphin Delivery Ltd
102
VI.
Lüth
107
VII.
Du Plessis v De Klerk
114
VIII.
Flagg Brothers, Inc. v Brooks
120
IX.
DeShaney v Winnebago County Department of Social Services
124
X.
The Duty to Protect: Roe v Wade and Erste Abtreibung
130
XI.
Reiten im Walde
151
XII.
Summary Reflections
155
1.
Vicissitudes of the State Action Doctrine
155
2.
The Contradictory Legacies that Informed Du Plessis
156
3.
The Dismantling of Swing, Shelley and Sullivan in Flagg Brothers and DeShaney
157
4.
Shifting Horizontal Effect Jurisprudence from Private to Legislative Relations
157
5.
Substantive and Procedural Due Process and the Question of Sovereignty
158
6.
Constitutional Histories of Peoples
163
ch. Three
State Action
166
I.
Introduction
166
II.
Michelman's "Hohfeldian Point"
168
III.
Wechsler and Tribe: Two Readings of Shelley
172
IV.
Seidman's Reading of DeShaney
181
V.
One Way out of the American Conceptual Impasse
190
ch. Four
Drittwirkung
201
I.
Introduction
201
II.
Nipperdey's Position
203
III.
Diirig's Position
207
IV.
Leisner's Position
212
V.
Schwabe's Position
222
VI.
Canaris' Response
227
VII.
Schutzpflicht and/or Drittwirkung?
230
Part Two: Sovereignty
ch. Five
Uninterrupted Sovereignty
235
I.
Introduction
235
II.
Divided Sovereignty
241
III.
Between Deism and Deontology Europe and Ordo-Liberalism
246
IV.
Dispersed Sovereignty Government and Governance
252
V.
Dispensed Sovereignty The Davidsonian Road to Luhmann
260
VI.
Uninterrupted Sovereignty A "Luhmannian" Return to Hegel
275
ch. Six
Differantial Sovereignty
293
I.
Introduction
293
II.
Coercive Enlightenment Ideals
296
III.
Carl Schmitt's Unitary Substantive Due Process and Indirect Horizontal Effect Jurisprudence
300
IV.
Hans Kelsen and the Open Duality of the Constitutional Democratic Whole
315
V.
Leisner's "Kelsenian" Horizontal Effect Jurisprudence
323
VI.
Differantial Sovereignty
327
ch. Seven
Sovereignty and the Dual Destiny of Lüth in Europe
334
I.
Introduction
334
II.
The Rise of European Union Sovereignty
338
III.
The Demise of German Sovereignty and the Marginalisation of Lüth in Germany
348
IV.
European Union Sovereignty Vertical and Monistic or Horizontal and Differential?
352
ch. Eight
Liberal Democratic Constitutional Review
361
I.
Introduction
361
II.
The Recognition of Sovereignty
366
III.
Liberal Democratic Sovereignty
368
IV.
Substantive and Procedural Due Process Constitutional Review
369
V.
The Proceduralisation of Minimum Substance and the First Proportionality Question
374
VI.
The Second Proportionality Question: Rationality and Effectiveness
379
VII.
The Third Proportionality Question: Minimal Intrusion
381
VIII.
The Difference between Ordinary and Constitutional Law
386
IX.
Social Liberal Democracy?
390
Bibliography
401
Abbreviations
419
Index of Persons
420
Subject Index
423