Hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings / JR Spencer.
2014
KD7525 .S64 2014 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Title
Hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings / JR Spencer.
Published
Oxford, United Kingdom ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2014.
Call Number
KD7525 .S64 2014
Edition
Second edition.
ISBN
9781849464635 (pbk.)
1849464634 (pbk.)
1849464634 (pbk.)
Description
xxxvi, 469 pages ; 24 cm
System Control No.
(OCoLC)859560436
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Preface to the Second Edition
v
Abbreviations
xi
Table of Cases
xiii
Table of Legislation
xxv
Table of Treaties
xxxvi
1.
Introduction
1
Hearsay rule and the rise and fall of the exclusionary rules of evidence
2
Scope and evolution of the hearsay rule
5
Hearsay rule in criminal law as it stood before the 2003 reform: justifications for the rule
9
Criticisms of the hearsay rule
14
Hearsay rule as seen by legal writers
20
The `directness principle' or `best evidence' approach
22
Abolition of the hearsay rule in civil proceedings
25
Background to the 2003 reform: Criminal Law Revision Committee, Fraud Trials Committee, Law Commission and Auld Review
27
Reform: Criminal Justice Act 2003, Part 11, Chapter 2
32
Conclusion: provisional assessment of the reform
35
Scope
39
Date of entry into force
40
2.
Hearsay and the European Convention on Human Rights
41
The confrontation principle
41
ECHR, Article 6 (3)(d)
43
Who is a `witness' for the purposes of ECHR, Article 6(3)(d)?
46
What is meant by `a right to examine or have examined witnesses against him'?
48
To what extent, if any, is it ever possible to base a conviction on the evidence of a witness or witnesses whom the defendant was unable to `examine or have examined', without infringing his rights under ECHR, Article 6(3)(d)?
55
The defendant's right to confrontation---the case for a new system of taking evidence ahead of trial
71
3.
The scope of the reform, the shape of the new exclusionary rule and the new scheme of exceptions
75
General scope of the new law
75
Abolition of the common law exclusionary rule: the demise of Kearley
75
The new exclusionary rule: CJA 2003, sections 114(1) and 115
78
The new definition of hearsay: conclusion
88
Scheme of exceptions
92
4.
Hearsay admitted by agreement
95
5.
The `inclusionary discretion' and the general discretion to exclude
101
Discretionary inclusion under CJA 2003, section 114(1)(d): `safety-valve' or alternative tap?
101
What are `the interests of justice'?
106
Particular applications of section 114(1)(d)
111
Discretionary exclusion: PACE, section 78 and CJA 2003, section 126
122
6.
Statements of witnesses who are unavailable (CJA 2003, section 116)
129
History: earlier provisions
129
The new provision: CJA 2003, section 116
131
7.
Documentary hearsay (CJA 2003, section 117)
151
History
151
Underlying issue: `records' of different types
152
CJA 2003, section 117
153
Extra conditions for the admissibility of police records
161
Discretion to exclude
163
Documentary evidence and real evidence
164
CJA 2003, section 117: conclusion
164
8.
Other statutory exceptions
165
9.
Preserved common law exceptions (CJA 2003, section 118)
171
Public information, etc
172
Reputation as to character
173
Reputation or family tradition
174
Res gestae
176
Confessions, etc
180
Admissions by agents, etc
181
Common enterprise
182
Expert evidence
185
10.
Confessions (and other extra-judicial statements by defendants)
187
Introduction
187
Defendant's extra-judicial confession as evidence for the prosecution
189
Defendant's extra-judicial `non-confession' as evidence for the defence: mixed statements', etc
201
Extra-judicial statement of one co-defendant as evidence against another
203
Extra-judicial statements of one co-defendant as evidence for another
209
Defendant's extra-judicial statements: conclusion
212
11.
Multiple hearsay
213
12.
The rule against narrative
221
Introduction
221
Rule against narrative is retained
225
Rules about `refreshment of memory' are relaxed
226
Other common law exceptions to the rule are reformed and put into statutory form
229
Where the previous statement of a witness is admissible, it is now `evidence of any matter stated in it'
236
A practical point: a previous statement, if in documentary form, must not normally be given to the jury when it retires
243
The rule against narrative: conclusion
243
13.
Videotaped evidence-in-chief
245
Introduction
245
Background
245
Annex: Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, section 27
252
14.
Other matters: experts (CJA 2003, section 127) and proof of documents (section 133)
255
Expert evidence: preparatory work
255
Documents: evidential status of a copy
257
15.
Practical issues
261
Taking, recording and preservation of statements, and the rules on access to them
261
Evidence on commission
266
Requirement to give notice of hearsay evidence: criminal procedure rules
267
Deciding applications to admit hearsay evidence and applications for hearsay to be excluded
269
Time and place for deciding on the application
272
Giving reasons for the decision
272
Credibility of non-witnesses whose statements are admitted
273
Enhanced status of a witness's previous statements
275
Stopping the case where the evidence is unconvincing
277
Directing juries
279
Appendix I
Criminal Justice Act 2003, sections 114--141
283
Appendix II
The Criminal Procedure Rules, Part 34
301
Appendix III
Sections on hearsay evidence from the Crown Court Bench Book Companion
311
Appendix IV
Leading Cases
321
R v Twist
321
R v Horncastle and others (CA)
333
R v Horncastle and others (SC)
372
Al-Khawaja and Tahery v UK
402
R v Riat, Doran, Wilson, Clare and Bennett
431
R v Tahery
453
Index
459