Intellectual property theory and practice : a critical examination of China's TRIPS compliance and beyond / Wenwei Guan.
2014
KNQ1155 .G83 2014 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Intellectual property theory and practice : a critical examination of China's TRIPS compliance and beyond / Wenwei Guan.
Published
Heidelberg ; New York ; Dordrecht ; London : Springer, [2014]
Copyright
©2014
Call Number
KNQ1155 .G83 2014
Former Call Number
Ch.P 670 G931 2014
ISBN
9783642552649
3642552641
3642552641
Description
xi, 168 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm
System Control No.
(OCoLC)878502408
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
1.
Intellectual Property: Concept, History, and Contentions
1
1.1.
The Concept of Intellectual Property
1
1.2.
A Brief History of Intellectual Property
2
1.3.
The Contentions and Implications of IPR Protection
5
1.4.
China's TRIPS Compliance and the Jurisprudential Significances
7
References
9
2.
Private-Public Dynamics: The Paradox of Intellectual Property Philosophy
11
2.1.
The Nature and the Theoretical Basis of Intellectual Property Rights
12
2.1.1.
The Nature of Intellectual Property Rights
12
2.1.2.
IPRs' Theoretical Basis: The Significance and Limit of Property Rights
17
2.2.
Formation of Intellectual Property: The Circular "Founding Violence"
23
2.2.1.
Historical Construction: From Privileges to Rights
23
2.2.2.
The Circular Construction of Intellectual Property Rights
25
2.2.3.
The Injection of the "Founding Violence"
27
2.3.
Alienation of Intellectual Property: The Violence Against Founding Violence
29
2.3.1.
Alienation as Violence: The Second Violence
29
2.3.2.
Alienation as Justice: The Violence Against Founding Violence
32
2.3.3.
Constant Deconstruction as Justice
34
2.4.
The Paradoxical Dynamics in Function
36
2.4.1.
Domestic Paradoxical Dynamics: Biting the Hand that Feeds
36
2.4.2.
International Paradoxical Dynamics: IPRs Versus Public Health
38
References
41
3.
Public-Private Dynamics in China's IP Regime and TRIPS Compliance
45
3.1.
Intellectual Creations in Ancient China: A Brief Historical Account
46
3.1.1.
Intellectual Property Law in China: From Ancient to Modern
46
3.1.2.
"Elegant Offense" Versus "Fair Use"
49
3.2.
The Three-Stage Evolution and the Delicate Public-Private Balance
53
3.2.1.
Stage One: The 1950s' Collective Orientation and the Public-Private Dynamics
53
3.2.2.
Stage Two: The Dominance of the Public Concern in the 1960s
56
3.2.3.
Stage Three: Post-1984 Evolution and the Delicate Public-Private Balance
58
3.3.
Olympic Marks Protection: One World Different Dreams
63
3.3.1.
USA and Canada: Private Rights with Private Teeth
63
3.3.2.
China: Public Protection for Private Rights
69
3.4.
The US-China Dynamics and China's TRIPS Compliance
72
3.4.1.
US-China Dynamics and China's Aggressive IPR Administration
72
3.4.2.
Ex Officio Action Under TRIPS
77
3.4.3.
China's TRIPS Implementation: Legitimate Nonuniform Compliance
81
References
94
4.
IP Perceptions Survey: The Dynamics in Reality
97
4.1.
The Legal System as Socially Derived Cultural Product
97
4.2.
An Overview: Hypothesis and Methods
99
4.2.1.
Hypothesis: Cultural Imperatives, Legal Orientations, and IPR Protection
99
4.2.2.
Research Methods: Method and Participants Overview
101
4.3.
Measures, Reliabilities, and Mean Differences
102
4.3.1.
Cultural Imperatives
102
4.3.2.
Legal Orientations
104
4.3.3.
IP Right Protection
107
4.4.
Further Discussion: Culture, Legal Orientations, and IPRs
109
4.4.1.
The Dynamics Between Private Property, Legal Relativism, and IP Protection
109
4.4.2.
Perception Dynamics: Interdependence, Private Rights, and Certainty of Law
112
References
113
5.
TRIPS' Legitimacy Deficit and the Myth of Modern Law
115
5.1.
TRIPS and the Development Deficit: The Cult of Knowledge and Progress
116
5.1.1.
TRIPS' Negative Consequences for Developing Countries
116
5.1.2.
TRIPS and the "Tech-Knowledgization" of the Development Deficit
119
5.2.
The Self-Sufficient Ontological Myth and the Author Function
122
5.2.1.
Trips for China: Economic Opportunity or Ontological Challenge
122
5.2.2.
The Self-Sufficient Ontological Myth of Intellectual Property Philosophy
125
5.2.3.
Author Function and the Enlightenment's Obsession with Origin
128
5.3.
The Self-Sufficient Legitimacy Deficit of Modern Law
130
5.3.1.
The Power of Precedent: Law's Constant Return to Origin
130
5.3.2.
The Oppressive Assimilation Force and Modern Law's Legitimacy Deficit
133
5.3.3.
Mythology of Modern Law: The Self-Sufficient Legitimacy Deficit
136
5.4.
Critique Through "Selective Adaptation" and a New Theory of Legitimacy
137
5.4.1.
Contractarian Legitimacy and the Significance of Consent
137
5.4.2.
The Evolving Nature of Member Consent in the WTO Framework
140
5.4.3.
Critique: Something More than Consent
143
5.4.4.
Selective Adaptation as the Quest for Legitimacy
146
5.4.5.
Cultural Relativism's Limit and Limit's Cultural Relativism
149
References
154
6.
Conclusion: Ontology, Legitimacy, and Time
159
References
166
Further Reading
167
Cases and Laws
167
WTO Documents and Cases
168