Working separately together : a quantitative study into the knowledge sharing behaviour of judges / Dr. Sandra Taal.
2016
K2146 .T33 2016 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Working separately together : a quantitative study into the knowledge sharing behaviour of judges / Dr. Sandra Taal.
Published
Berne : Stämpfli Publishers Ltd ; Baden-Baden : Nomos ; Wien : Jan Sramek, [2016]
Copyright
©2016
Call Number
K2146 .T33 2016
ISBN
9783727276750 (paperback Stämpfi)
3727276754 (paperback Stämpfi)
9783848733361 (Nomos)
3848733366 (Nomos)
9783709701102 (Jan Sramek)
3709701104 (Jan Sramek)
9783727259548 (E-book)
372725954X (E-book)
3727276754 (paperback Stämpfi)
9783848733361 (Nomos)
3848733366 (Nomos)
9783709701102 (Jan Sramek)
3709701104 (Jan Sramek)
9783727259548 (E-book)
372725954X (E-book)
Description
xiii, 193 pages : tables, figures ; 23 cm.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)959260992
Summary
"Judges are knowledge workers 'par excellence'. Judges regularly need to sharpen and update their knowledge in order to respond to the complexity of daily work tasks. To ensure that judges are able to perform at their utmost level, it is important that they can make optimal use of the available knowledge in the organization. Whereas only part of the available knowledge in the organization is formally captured (e.g. in commentaries), judges need each other (and other important knowledge holders in the court) to obtain access to non-codified and personally retained knowldege. Through collegial knowledge sharing, judges can discuss complex legal matters and reflect on practical difficulties in their work. The focus of this book is on the knowledge sharing behaviour of judges, which is studied empirically using survey data from 447 professional administrative law judges employed in Switerzland, Germany and the Netherlands. The author reveals some interesting patterns concerning the factors influencing this type of prosocial workplace behaviour. Practical recommendations are formulated to inform court organizations about a number of steps that can be taken to foster collegial knowledge sharing in courts."-- Back cover.
Note
Original doctoral dissertation from Utrecht University, 2016.
Bibliography, etc. Note
With bibliographical references (pages 139-166) and index.
Record Appears in
Table of Contents
Introduction
Literature review, research model and hypotheses
Method
Results
Discussion and conclusion.
Literature review, research model and hypotheses
Method
Results
Discussion and conclusion.