EU criminal law after Lisbon : rights, trust and the transformation of justice in Europe / Valsamis Mitsilegas.
2016
KJE9430 .M58 2016 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Title
EU criminal law after Lisbon : rights, trust and the transformation of justice in Europe / Valsamis Mitsilegas.
Published
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2016.
Call Number
KJE9430 .M58 2016
ISBN
9781849466486 (hardback : alk. paper)
1849466483 (hardback : alk. paper)
9781782259886 (Epub)
9781782259879
1849466483 (hardback : alk. paper)
9781782259886 (Epub)
9781782259879
Description
xxxiii, 295 pages ; 24 cm.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)893893996
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 272-285) and index.
Available in Other Form
Online version: Mitsilegas, Valsamis, 1971- author. EU criminal law after Lisbon Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, USA : Hart Publishing, Ltd., 2016 9781782259886 (DLC) 2016006632
Record Appears in
Variant Title
European Union criminal law after Lisbon
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
v
Table of Cases
xiii
Table of Legislation
xix
1.
Introduction
1
2.
Constitutionalisation of EU Criminal Law After Lisbon
4
I.
Introduction
4
II.
Constitutionalisation of EU Criminal Law
5
A.
Constitutionalisation at EU level: Institutions, Principles, Rights
5
B.
Constitutionalisation and the Member States: Focusing on Transposition and Implementation
11
C.
Constitutionalisation as Interdependence. Towards a More Coherent EU Criminal Policy
13
III.
Persistence of National Diversity
14
IV.
Competence Debate-Contested Competence
19
A.
Contested Competence: Member States v The EU-The Lissabon-Urteil
19
B.
Contested Competence and Inter-institutional Balance: The Road Traffic Offences Directive Case
21
C.
Contested Competence and Inter-institutional Balance: The Internal/External Dimension-The Case of Terrorist Sanctions
25
V.
Limits of Subsidiarity
40
VI.
Limits of Justice A-la-Carte: Variable Geometry and the Case of the United Kingdom
44
VII.
Conclusion
50
3.
Defining EU Competence in Substantive Criminal Law: From Securitised to Functional Criminalisation
53
I.
Introduction
53
II.
Constitutional Politics of Criminalisation Before Lisbon: The Interplay Between Securitised and Functional Criminalisation
54
III.
EU Competence to Criminalise After Lisbon: Securitised and Functional Criminalisation Revisited
57
A.
Securitised Criminalisation-Article 83(1) TFEU
58
B.
Functional Criminalisation-Article 83(2) TFEU
60
C.
Extent of EU Competence to Criminalise: Minimum Rules
62
IV.
Relationship Between Criminal and Adminstrative Law
63
V.
Extending EU Competence to Criminalise Elsewhere in the Treaty
65
VI.
Policy Responses to the EU Competence to Criminalise After Lisbon
68
VII.
Lisbon Treaty and the Impact on National Criminal Law
72
A.
Effectiveness and National Criminal Law: Decriminalisation
73
B.
Effectiveness as Assimilation: Over-criminalisation
74
VIII.
Conclusion
80
4.
Rocky Road to European Prosecution: Caught Between Co-ordination and Centralisation
83
I.
Introduction
83
II.
Horizontal Co-ordination via the Protection of Fundamental Rights: The Emergence of a Transnational Ne Bis In Idem Principle
84
III.
Horizontal Co-ordination via the Establishment of Common Standards-The Case of Decisions on Choice of Forum and Conflicts of Jurisdiction
91
IV.
Towards Vertical Co-ordination: The Evolution and Powers of Eurojust
94
A.
Commission's Proposal for a Eurojust Regulation
96
B.
Council General Approach
101
V.
Towards the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office-Ambitions and Limits to Centralisation
103
A.
Structure and Powers of the European Public Prosecutor's Office
104
B.
Competence, Scope, Territoriality
109
C.
Judicial Review of the European Public Prosecutor's Office at EU Level
113
i.
Constitutional Challenges from Limiting EU Judicial Review for Acts of the EPPO
113
ii.
Judicial Review of Investigation Decisions and Acts: Lessons from OLAF
117
VI.
Quest for Coherence in Prosecution in a Fragmented Area of Criminal Justice
119
VII.
Conclusion
121
5.
Mutual Recognition and Mutual Trust in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice: The Centrality of Fundamental Rights
124
I.
Introduction
124
II.
Mutual Recognition as Legal Pluralism
125
III.
Establishing Limits to Automatic Recognition: The Role of Fundamental Rights
129
A.
Fundamental Rights as Grounds for Refusal in the European Arrest Warrant Case-Law
131
B.
Fundamental Rights as Limits to Automatic Recognition: Lessons from European Asylum Law
136
C.
Mutual Trust and Fundamental Rights: The Impact of Opinion 2/13
140
IV.
Proportionality as a Limit to Mutual Recognition
142
V.
Mutual Recognition, Mutual Trust and the Rule of Law
147
VI.
Conclusion: From Presumed to Earned Trust in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice
151
6.
Legislating for Human Rights: The EU Legal Framework on the Rights of Individuals in Criminal Proceedings
153
I.
Introduction
153
II.
Rocky Road Towards EU Law on the Rights of the Defendant Before Lisbon
154
III.
Lisbon Breakthrough-The Attribution of An Express (Albeit Functional) Competence to the European Union to Legislate on the Rights of the Individual in Criminal Procedure
156
IV.
Renewed Momentum Towards EU Procedural Rights in the Light of Lisbon
158
V.
Content of EU Procedural Rights
160
A.
Directive on the Right to Interpretation and Translation
161
B.
Directive on the Right to Information
162
C.
Directive on the Right of Access to a Lawyer
165
VI.
Horizontal Issues: The Scope and Level of Protection of Procedural Rights After Lisbon
171
VII.
Impact of EU Procedural Rights on National Legal Systems: Enforcement and Implementation of Rights
175
VIII.
Impact of EU Procedural Rights on National Legal Diversity-The Role of Autonomous Concepts
176
IX.
Variable Geometry and EU Procedural Rights-The Quest for Coherence
180
X.
Conclusion: Towards a Paradigm Change in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice
183
7.
Place of the Victim in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice
185
I.
Introduction
185
II.
Victims' Rights in EU Criminal Law-A Typology
186
A.
Victims' Rights as Free Movement Rights
187
B.
Mutual Recognition
188
C.
Harmonisation
190
III.
Place of the Victim in Europe's Area of Criminal Justice: Constitutional Implications
195
IV.
Impact of EU Law on Victims' Rights on National Criminal Justice Systems
199
A.
Mutual Recognition
199
B.
Harmonisation
202
V.
Impact of Victims' Rights on Justice in Europe
206
VI.
Conclusion
210
8.
Uneasy Relationship Between EU Criminal Law and Citizenship of the Union
212
I.
Introduction
212
II.
Citizenship in EU Criminal Law
212
A.
EU Citizenship in the European Arrest Warrant
213
B.
EU Citizenship in the EU System on Transfer of Prisoners
220
III.
EU Criminal Law in EU Citizenship
223
A.
Impact of Secondary EU Criminal Law on EU Citizenship-Tsakouridis
223
B.
Impact of Primary EU Criminal Law on EU Citizenship: Article 83(1) TFEU and RI
227
IV.
Conclusion: Towards a Paradigm Change in Citizenship and EU Criminal Law
234
9.
European Union and Preventive Justice. The Case of Terrorist Sanctions
236
I.
Introduction
236
II.
Preventive Justice via 'Global Administrative Law': The Role of the UN Security Council
237
III.
Implementation of the UN Security Council Resolutions by the European Union
241
IV.
Judicial Review of the EU Implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions: Kadi I
245
V.
Judicial Review of the EU Implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions: Kadi II
249
VI.
Extending the Preventive Justice Framework in the Field of Counter-Terrorism: The Case of Measures on 'Foreign Fighters'
257
VII.
Conclusion: Preventive Justice and the Limits of Procedural Justice
260
10.
Conclusion. Placing the Individual at the Heart of European Criminal Justice
263
A.
Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on National Legal Diversity-From Cooperation and Mutual Recognition to Interdependence and Harmonisation
264
B.
Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Relationship Between the Individual and the State-The Growing Importance of Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law
266
C.
Promise of Rights-The Individual at the Heart of European Criminal Justice
270
Bibliography
272
Index
287