Feminist judgments : rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court / Kathryn M. Stanchi (Temple University Beasley School of Law), Linda L. Berger (University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law), Bridget J. Crawford (Pace University School of Law).
2016
KF478 .C74 2016 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
Feminist judgments : rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court / Kathryn M. Stanchi (Temple University Beasley School of Law), Linda L. Berger (University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law), Bridget J. Crawford (Pace University School of Law).
Published
New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Copyright
©2016
Call Number
KF478 .C74 2016
Other Title
Rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court
ISBN
9781107126626 (hardback)
1107126622 (hardback)
9781107565609 (paperback)
110756560X (paperback)
1107126622 (hardback)
9781107565609 (paperback)
110756560X (paperback)
Description
xlvii, 566 pages ; 23 cm.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)940342395
Summary
"What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant U.S. Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging"--Publisher's website.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Series
Record Appears in
Gift
Purchased from the income of the Fisch Fund
Added Author
Gift
The Arthur W. Diamond Law Library
Purchased from the income of the Fisch Fund
Table of Contents
Notes on contributors
xi
Advisory panel
xxv
Preface
xxix
Acknowledgments
xxxi
About the cover art
xxxiii
Table of cases
xxxv
pt. I
Introduction and overview
1.
Introduction to the U.S. feminist judgments project / Bridget J. Crawford
3
2.
Talking back: From feminist history and theory to feminist legal methods and judgments / Berta Esperanza Hernandez-Truyol
24
pt. II
feminist judgments
3.
Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 U.S. 130 (1873)
55
Commentary / Kimberly Holst
Judgment / Phyllis Goldfarb
4.
Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908)
78
Commentary / Andrea Doneff
Judgment / Pamela Laufer-Ukeles
5.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
98
Commentary / Cynthia Hawkins DeBose
Judgment / Laura Rosenbury
6.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)
114
Commentary / Inga N. Laurent
Judgment / Teri McMurtry-Chubb
7.
Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972)
137
Commentary / Nancy D. Polikoff
Judgment / Karen Syma Czapanskiy
8.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
146
Commentary / Rachel Rebouche
Judgment / Kimberly M. Mutcherson
9.
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973)
168
Commentary / Iselin M. Gambert
Judgment / Dara E. Purvis
10.
Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974)
185
Commentary / Maya Manian
Judgment / Lucinda M. Finley
11.
Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977)
208
Commentary / Brenda V. Smith
Judgment / Maria L. Ontiveros
12.
City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978)
228
Commentary / Cassandra Jones Havard
Judgment / Tracy A. Thomas
13.
Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980)
242
Commentary / Mary Ziegler
Judgment / Leslie C. Griffin
14.
Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981)
257
Commentary / Margo Kaplan
Judgment / Cynthia Godsoe
15.
Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981)
272
Commentary / Jamie R. Abrams
Judgment / David S. Cohen
16.
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986)
297
Commentary / Kristen Konrad Tiscione
Judgment / Angela Onwuachi-Willig
17.
Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987)
322
Commentary / Deborah Gordon
Judgment / Deborah L. Rhode
18.
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989)
341
Commentary / Dale Margolin Cecka
Judgment / Martha Chamallas
19.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
361
Commentary / Macarena Saez
Judgment / Lisa R. Pruitt
20.
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996)
384
Commentary / Christine M. Venter
Judgment / Valorie K. Vojdik
21.
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998)
408
Commentary / Margaret E. Johnson
Judgment / Ann C. McGinley
22.
Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District
524
U.S. 274 (1998)
426
Commentary / Michelle S. Simon
Judgment / Ann Bartow
23.
United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000)
447
Commentary / Shaakirrah R. Sanders
Judgment / Anibal Rosario Lebron
24.
Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. 53 (2001)
468
Commentary / Sandra S. Park
Judgment / Ilene Durst
25.
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
485
Commentary / Kris McDaniel-Miccio
Judgment / Ruthann Robson
26.
Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005)
504
Commentary / Patricia A. Broussard
Judgment / Maria Isabel Medina
27.
Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015)
527
Commentary / Erez Aloni
Judgment / Carlos A. Ball
Index
547