The 9/11 terror cases : constitutional challenges in the war against Al Qaeda / Allan A. Ryan.
2015
KF221.P6 R897 2015 (Map It)
Available at Cellar
Formats
Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Items
Details
Author
Title
The 9/11 terror cases : constitutional challenges in the war against Al Qaeda / Allan A. Ryan.
Published
Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2015]
Call Number
KF221.P6 R897 2015
ISBN
9780700621323 (hardback)
0700621326 (hardback)
9780700621705 (pbk. ; alk. paper)
0700621709 (pbk. ; alk. paper)
9780700621613 (ebook)
0700621326 (hardback)
9780700621705 (pbk. ; alk. paper)
0700621709 (pbk. ; alk. paper)
9780700621613 (ebook)
Description
xix, 218 pages ; 22 cm.
System Control No.
(OCoLC)911135114
Summary
"The terrorist attacks of 9/11 are indelibly etched into our cultural memory. This is the story of how the legal ramifications of that day brought two presidents, Congress, and the Supreme Court into repeated confrontation over the incarceration of hundreds of suspected terrorists and "enemy combatants" at the US naval base in Guantanamo, Cuba. Could these prisoners (including an American citizen) be held indefinitely without due process of law? Did they have the right to seek their release by habeas corpus in US courts? Could they be tried in a makeshift military judicial system? With Guantanamo well into its second decade, these questions have challenged the three branches of government, each contending with the others, and each invoking the Constitution's separation of powers as well as its checks and balances. In The 9/11 Terror Cases, Allan A. Ryan leads students and general readers through the pertinent cases: Rasul v. Bush and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, both decided by the Supreme Court in 2004; Hamdan v. Bush, decided in 2006; and Boumediene v. Bush, in 2008. An eloquent writer and an expert in military law and constitutional litigation, Ryan is an adept guide through the nuanced complexities of these cases, which rejected the sweeping powers asserted by President Bush and Congress, and upheld the rule of law, even for enemy combatants. In doing so, as we see clearly in Ryan's deft account, the Supreme Court's rulings speak directly to the extent and nature of presidential and congressional prerogative, and to the critical separation and balance of powers in the governing of the United States"-- Provided by publisher.
Bibliography, etc. Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 205-211) and index.
Record Appears in
Gift
Purchased from the income of the Fisch Fund
Gift

The Arthur W. Diamond Law Library
Purchased from the income of the Fisch Fund
Table of Contents
Editors' Preface
ix
Preface
xi
Acknowledgments
xix
1.
Guantanamo
1
2.
First Cases
11
3.
Supreme Court
34
4.
Decisions of 2004: Rasul, Hamdi, and Padilla
64
5.
Hamdan
86
6.
Boumediene
115
7.
Obama Administration
148
8.
Conclusion
178
Glossary
193
Chronology
197
Bibliographical Essay
205
Index
213