In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States, petitioner, v. Refugio Palomar-Santiago, respondent :: on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : brief for former Executive Office of Immigration Review judges as amici curiae in support of respondent /: Richard W. Mark, counsel of record, [and 4 others], counsel for amici curiae.

Mark, Richard W.,; Palomar-Santiago, Refugio,; United States,; United States.

In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States, petitioner, v. Refugio Palomar-Santiago, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : brief for former Executive Office of Immigration Review judges as amici curiae in support of respondent / Richard W. Mark, counsel of record, [and 4 others], counsel for amici curiae.

Mark, Richard W., author.; Palomar-Santiago, Refugio, respondent.; United States, petitioner.; United States. Supreme Court.; United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)

2021

INTERNET

Available Online

Formats

Format
BibTeX
MARCXML
TextMARC
MARC
DublinCore
EndNote
NLM
RefWorks
RIS

Add to Basket

Details

E-resource Policy

Subject to Electronic Resource Use Policy

Linked Resources

HeinOnline Immigration Law & Policy in the U.S.

Author

Mark, Richard W., author.

Title

In the Supreme Court of the United States, United States, petitioner, v. Refugio Palomar-Santiago, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : brief for former Executive Office of Immigration Review judges as amici curiae in support of respondent / Richard W. Mark, counsel of record, [and 4 others], counsel for amici curiae.

Published

[United States] : [publisher not identified], 2021.

Distributed

[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2021]

Call Number

INTERNET

Variant Title

HeinOnline index title: Brief amici curiae of former Executive Office of Immigration Review judges

Description

1 online resource (v, 19, 5a pages).

System Control No.

(NjRocCCS)ccn001019222

Summary

The question presented is whether a defendant automatically satisfies all three of the statutory prerequisites in Title 8 of the U.S. Code, Section 1326(d) solely by showing that he was removed for a crime that would not be considered a removable offense under current circuit law, even if he cannot independently demonstrate administrative exhaustion or deprivation of the opportunity for judicial review.

Note

"No. 20-437."
"March 31, 2021"--Page 19.

Bibliography, etc. Note

"Table of authorities": pages ii-v.

Digital File Characteristics

text file

Source of Description

Description based on PDF title page, viewed October 9, 2021.

Series

Immigration law & policy in the U.S.

Record Appears in

Remotely Accessible Online Resources
All Resources