In the Supreme Court of the United States, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, petitioner, v. Naiel Nassar, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit : brief of the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, the Employment Justice Center, and employment litigators as amici curiae in support of respondent / Neal Goldfarb, counsel of record [and 3 others], counsel for amici curiae.
Goldfarb, Neal, author.; Nassar, Naiel N., respondent.; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, petitioner.; Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, amicus curiae.; Employment Justice Center, amicus curiae.; United States. Supreme Court.; United States. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
2013
INTERNET
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Details
E-resource Policy
Linked Resources
Author
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, petitioner, v. Naiel Nassar, respondent : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit : brief of the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, the Employment Justice Center, and employment litigators as amici curiae in support of respondent / Neal Goldfarb, counsel of record [and 3 others], counsel for amici curiae.
Published
[Washington, District of Columbia?] : [Neal Goldfarb?], [2013]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2020]
Call Number
INTERNET
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: Brief for the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, the Employment Justice Center, and Employment Litigators in support of respondent
Description
1 online resource (xvii, 34, 28a pages).
System Control No.
(NjRocCCS)ccn00953608
Summary
At issue is whether, under the retaliation provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII, it must be shown that an employer would not have taken an action but for an improper motive, or is proof of a mixed motive sufficient.
Note
"No. 12-484."
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities"--Pages v-ix.
Digital File Characteristics
text file
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed November 24, 2020.
Record Appears in
Added Author