In the Supreme Court of the United States, Department of Health and Human Services, et al. petitioners, v. State of Florida, et al : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit : brief of amici curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., American Civil Liberties Union, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights in support of petitioners (minimum coverage provision) / Elise C. Boddie, counsel of record [and 7 others].
Boddie, Elise C., author.; United States. Department of Health and Human Services, petitioner.; Florida, respondent, petitioner.; NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, amicus curiae.; American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.; Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, amicus curiae.; United States. Supreme Court.; United States. Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
2012
INTERNET
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Details
E-resource Policy
Linked Resources
Author
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Department of Health and Human Services, et al. petitioners, v. State of Florida, et al : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit : brief of amici curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., American Civil Liberties Union, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights in support of petitioners (minimum coverage provision) / Elise C. Boddie, counsel of record [and 7 others].
Published
[New York, N.Y.?] : [NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.?], [2012]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2020]
Call Number
INTERNET
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: Brief for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights in support of petitioner regarding the minimum coverage provision
Description
1 online resource (vii, 25 pages).
System Control No.
(NjRocCCS)ccn00953469
Summary
At issue is whether Congress' passage of the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate provision, requiring the purchase of health insurance, exceeds Congress' authority, and is it inconsistent with core constitutional principles of federalism.
Note
"No. 11-398."
"January 13, 2012"--Page 25.
"January 13, 2012"--Page 25.
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities"--Pages iii-vii.
Digital File Characteristics
text file
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed November 23, 2020.
Record Appears in
Added Corporate Author
United States. Department of Health and Human Services, petitioner.
Florida, respondent, petitioner.
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, amicus curiae.
American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, amicus curiae.
United States. Supreme Court.
United States. Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
Florida, respondent, petitioner.
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, amicus curiae.
American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, amicus curiae.
United States. Supreme Court.
United States. Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)