In the Supreme Court of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, et al., petitioners, v. Regents of the University of California, et al., respondents : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [and 2 other consolidated captioned cases] : brief for Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the Anti-Defamation League, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and 42 other social justice organizations as amici curiae in support of respondents / William D. Coston, counsel of record [and 8 others], counsel for amici curiae.
Coston, William D., author.; United States. Department of Homeland Security, petitioner.; University of California (System). Regents, respondent.; Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, amicus curiae.; Anti-defamation League, amicus curiae.; Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, amicus curiae.; United States. Supreme Court.; United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
2019
INTERNET
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Details
E-resource Policy
Linked Resources
Author
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, et al., petitioners, v. Regents of the University of California, et al., respondents : on writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [and 2 other consolidated captioned cases] : brief for Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the Anti-Defamation League, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, and 42 other social justice organizations as amici curiae in support of respondents / William D. Coston, counsel of record [and 8 others], counsel for amici curiae.
Published
Washington, D.C. : Wilson-Epes Printing Co., Inc., [2019]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2020]
Call Number
INTERNET
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: Brief for Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights under Law, et al.
Description
1 online resource (ix, 22, 2a pages).
System Control No.
(NjRocCCS)ccn00951619
Summary
At issue is whether the Deparment of Homeland Security's decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) is judicially reviewable and lawful.
Note
"Nos. 18-587, 18-588, 18-589."
Captions of additional consolidated cases are: Donald J. Trump, president of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et. al., respondents, on writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., petitioners, v. Martin Jonathan Batalla Vidal, et al., respondents, on writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
"October 4, 2019."
Captions of additional consolidated cases are: Donald J. Trump, president of the United States, et al., petitioners, v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et. al., respondents, on writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., petitioners, v. Martin Jonathan Batalla Vidal, et al., respondents, on writ of certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
"October 4, 2019."
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities"--Pages iv-ix.
Digital File Characteristics
text file
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed October 15, 2020.
Record Appears in
Added Corporate Author
United States. Department of Homeland Security, petitioner.
University of California (System). Regents, respondent.
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, amicus curiae.
Anti-defamation League, amicus curiae.
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, amicus curiae.
United States. Supreme Court.
United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
University of California (System). Regents, respondent.
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, amicus curiae.
Anti-defamation League, amicus curiae.
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, amicus curiae.
United States. Supreme Court.
United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)