In the Supreme Court of the United States, Kathleen Sebelius, et al., petitioners v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., respondents ; Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation, et al., petitioners, v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth and Third Circuits : brief amici curiae of Jullian Bond [and 5 others], in support of the government / Brigitte Amiri, counsel of record [and 8 others].
Amiri, Brigitte, author.; Sebelius, Kathleen, 1948- petitioner, respondent.; Bond, Julian, 1940-2015, amicus curiae.; Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., respondent.; Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation, petitioner.; United States. Supreme Court.; United States. Court of Appeals (Third Circuit); United States. Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
2013
INTERNET
Formats
| Format | |
|---|---|
| BibTeX | |
| MARCXML | |
| TextMARC | |
| MARC | |
| DublinCore | |
| EndNote | |
| NLM | |
| RefWorks | |
| RIS |
Details
E-resource Policy
Linked Resources
Author
Title
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Kathleen Sebelius, et al., petitioners v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., respondents ; Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation, et al., petitioners, v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., respondents : on writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth and Third Circuits : brief amici curiae of Jullian Bond [and 5 others], in support of the government / Brigitte Amiri, counsel of record [and 8 others].
Published
[New York?] : [American Civil Liberties Union Foundation?], [2013]
Distributed
[Getzville, New York] : William S. Hein & Company, [2020]
Call Number
INTERNET
Variant Title
HeinOnline index title: Brief for Julian Bond, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Pennsylvania, the ACLU of Oklahoma, the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., and the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation, in Support of the Government
Description
1 online resource (viii, 35 pages).
System Control No.
(NjRocCCS)ccn00951606
Summary
At issue is whether the Affordable Care Act's requirement that employers' health insurance for employees includes coverage for contraceptives presents a substantial burden to the employers' exercise of religion.
Note
"Nos. 13-354 & 13-356."
Bibliography, etc. Note
"Table of authorities"--Pages ii-viii.
Digital File Characteristics
text file
Source of Description
Description based on PDF title page, viewed October 15, 2020.
Record Appears in
Added Author